Dismissal of Sex Harassment Claims Affirmed, Says U.S. Appeals for the 2nd Circuit
Daily Record (Rochester, NY) › October 12, 2011
Linked as:
Daily Record (Rochester, NY) › October 12, 2011
Linked as:Summary
No reasonable jury would believe the sexual harassment claims a Monroe County woman made against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled.
The court Tuesday dismissed the claims of Sandra Rojas, a former diocese employee, that she was sexually harassed by a Brockport priest. Rojas had claimed the Rev. Peter Enyan-Boadu kissed her on the lips, touched her breast, made inappropriate sexual comments and tried to force her to touch his penis on various dates in July and October 2006.See the full content of this document
Extract
Dismissal of Sex Harassment Claims Affirmed, Says U.S. Appeals for the 2nd Circuit
Her attorney, Christina A. Agola of Brighton, believes the decision is incorrect and plans to request a review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
"We hold that the district court did not err in concluding that, in light of Rojas' inconsistent and contradictory testimony, there was no genuine issue of fact to be decided by a jury," the decision says, affirming the Oct. 6, 2010 ruling of U.S. Distr...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR): Competitive acquisition; debriefing, | Darrell Rittenberry Petitioner-Appellant v Jack Morgan Respondent-Appellee. 4... | USA vs Blanco-Lobo 5th Cir 2006 | Meetings Materials Research Special Emphasis Panel, | Sentencia nº 229104 de Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago Sala Cuenta September 12 2011 | resolución nº 118272, de corte de apelaciones de santiago - sala novena, august 26, 2008 | decisión de superior en lo civil y contencioso administrativo de aragua de november 17 2011 | sentencia nº 1344 de corte de apelaciones de rancagua sala segunda january 19 2010